The main idea of the New York Times is nomadic wanting to domesticate plants in a building. The problem is that it takes a lot of funding to make the project happen. But there are some people that are against this project so the article is like a debate. In my opinion i don't think that is is a good idea. I know that its because it takes a lot of space but its not the primitive way to do it. Because you have to have a irrigate system and cultivate system. And i also think that its not very fertile because that plants that we grow are natural. Plus i believe in deify, and i think that god make or puts everything on earth for a reason and making plants in a building would take away some of the things that he put on earth. And what would happen to the sedentary because i know that there are people out there that don't move because they want to keep there field and crops. I think that they should codify so that it doesn't happen at all in any state. In general i think that the author might be against with the idea of the building. But i don't think that it was very determinat, because i hardly understood anything that i was reading. To state in conclustion this article was very hard to read.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment